Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 10 No. 11 (2023)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

OBSERVATION OF INDICATORS OF PROSTHETIC STOMATITIS IN PATIENTS USING PROSTHESES MADE OF ETHACRYL AND FTOROX

Published 2023-11-09

  • Atakhonov Azizbek Abdisalamovich

Atakhonov Azizbek Abdisalamovich
Assistant of the department of orthopedic dentistry and orthodontics Andijan State Medical Institute, Uzbekistan, Andijan

Abstract

This article discusses the frequency and clinical manifestations of stomatitis in patients after ethacryl and ftorox prosthesis. 45 patients aged 30 to 70 years were examined with ethacrylate and fluorox polymers. 25 men and 20 women participated in the survey. All patients required partial removable prostheses. There were no contraindications for prosthetics. Prostheses are made of ethacrylate and fluorox. Due to the urgency, there is a need for medical assistance, social problem, effective complex treatment of patients, development of new technologies for partial and complete absence of teeth.

Keywords

Acrylic polymer, ftorox polymer, prosthetic stomatitis, prosthetics, questionnaires.

DOWNLOAD PDF CERTIFICATE

References

  1. Zaitseva, A. V. Clinical case of prosthetic treatment of patients with metal acrylate suffering from chronic generalized periodontitis. A. V. Zaitseva, E. S. Temkin, V. I. Shemonaev. Journal of scientific articles Health and education in the 21st century. 2017. T. 19, No. 11.S. 118121.
  2. Changes in the oral mucosa when using removable laminar dentures. M. T. Thazaplizheva, A. O. Balkarov, S. A. Balkarova [and others]. 2019. No. 1(65). pp. 34–43.
  3. Karaseva, V.V. Step-by-step orthopedic rehabilitation of a patient with an acquired defect of the upper jaw. V.V. Karaseva. Materials of the International Congress “Dentistry of the Greater Urals”. Ekaterinburg, 2020. P66–68.
  4. Clinical effectiveness of orthopedic treatment of dentition defects with arch prostheses with a polyoxymethylene frame. V.V. Konnov, M.R.Arutyunyan, M.V. Vorobyova, A.S. Khodorich, R.N. Mukhamedov, D. A. Domenyuk. Medical alphabet.2020. No. 3. pp. 29–34.
  5. Lynchenko, I.V. Improvement of dental milling machines used in the manufacture of combined dentures. I. V. Lynchenko. Colloquium journal. 2019. No. 25 3(49). pp. 30–32.
  6. Reasons for patient requests for restoration of removable dentures during the warranty period. E. M. Akhmetov, V. E. Fedorov, N. Yu. Bukhkamer [and others]. Institute of Dentistry. 2019. No. 2(83). pp. 32–35.
  7. Bornstein, M. M. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. / M. M. Bornstein, K. Horner, R. Jacobs. periodontol. 2017. Vol. 73(1). P. 51-72.
  8. CAD/CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures: a case report. A. L. Carneiro Pereira, L. M. Martins de Aquino, R. F. Carvalho Porto de Freitas. Text: J. Comput.Dent. 2019. Vol. 22(4). P. 371–379. 231.
  9. Cebeci, N. Ö. Factors associated with insufficientremovable partial denture design instructions N.Ö. Cebeci. Dent. Med. Probl.2018. Apr.-Jun., Vol. 55(2). – P. 173–177.
  10. Cell adhesion to acrylic custom provisional abutment placed on an immediate implant: a casereport / H. Saito, D. P. Tarnow, M. A. Reynolds[et al.]. Compend. Contin. Educ.Dent. 2017. Vol. 38(2). – P. 114–119.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.