LINGUISTIC AND APHORISTIC DESCRIPTION OF PARADOXICAL TEXT CONCEPTS

Authors

Ilyosov Umidjon Ilyos ugli.,Khamidova Sevara Bakhtiyorovna Head of English Language Practical Course Department Jizzak State Pedagogical University Faculty of Philology, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, student of group 744-22,

Keywords:

literary text, paradox, meaning, communicative function, interpretation

Abstract

This article explores the concept of paradox in literary texts. The author discusses various definitions of text and its communicative function, and argues that a literary text is a multidimensional linguistic space that represents the author’s thoughts and ideas. The article also examines the role of paradox in creating meaning in a literary text, and highlights the characteristics of paradoxically defined literary texts. The author concludes that paradox plays a significant role in deepening the understanding of content and challenging conventional thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurahmonov H. Mahmudov N.So‘z estetikasi. – Toshkent.:Fan,1981.-B.38-37

Xamidova S.B. Paradoksning lingvokultrologik tahlili// Ta`lim,fan va innovatsiya ma’naviy, ma’rifiy, ilmiy-uslubiy jurnal –Toshkent,2023.-№2.-B.250-253

Xamidova.S.B.Ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida paradoksning ma’no hosil qilish potensiali//Xorazm Ma’mun Akademiyasi Axborotnomasi.Xiva -2023-5/4 B.191-193

Xamidova S.B.Paradoks lingvistik fenomen sifatida // Innovation in Technology And Science Education.SJIF 2023:5.305 ISSN 2181-371X Volume 2 Issue 8.B.1044-1053.www.humoscience.com

Xamidova.S.B. Paradoks lingvistik fenomen sifatida //Scientific Aspects and Trends in the Field of Scientific Research. Poland International Scientific Online Conference.- Poland. Warsaw, 2023.March 30.Part 8.P.338-343

Baldick Chris. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms //N.Y.: Оxford university press, 2001. – P . 183.

43.Batanouny G.M. El. Syntactic and Semantic Classification of Paradox and their Relation to Reader's Interpretation. // Journal of Literary Semantics. –Canterbury, 1991. – XX/3. – p. 129-163.

44.Bertolet R. What is said: A theory of indirect speech reports /R.Bertolet. – Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer, 1990. – 251 p.

45.Dilthey W. The Rise of Hermeneutics // New LitHistory.Charlottesville, 1972. – V.2. – №2. – P 229-243.

46.Dahl R. You never know. – Moscow: “Tsitadel”, 2001. – 206p

47.Dowden B. The Liar Paradox. Annual Internet encyclopedia Philosophy.2007. available at: www.iep.utm.edu/p/par-liar.htm.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Ilyosov Umidjon Ilyos ugli.,Khamidova Sevara Bakhtiyorovna. (2025). LINGUISTIC AND APHORISTIC DESCRIPTION OF PARADOXICAL TEXT CONCEPTS. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(09), 323–328. Retrieved from https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd/article/view/3767