Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 09 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

LINGUISTIC AND APHORISTIC DESCRIPTION OF PARADOXICAL TEXT CONCEPTS

Published 2025-09-30

  • Ilyosov Umidjon Ilyos ugli.,Khamidova Sevara Bakhtiyorovna

Ilyosov Umidjon Ilyos ugli.,Khamidova Sevara Bakhtiyorovna
Head of English Language Practical Course Department Jizzak State Pedagogical University Faculty of Philology, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, student of group 744-22,

Abstract

This article explores the concept of paradox in literary texts. The author discusses various definitions of text and its communicative function, and argues that a literary text is a multidimensional linguistic space that represents the author’s thoughts and ideas. The article also examines the role of paradox in creating meaning in a literary text, and highlights the characteristics of paradoxically defined literary texts. The author concludes that paradox plays a significant role in deepening the understanding of content and challenging conventional thinking.

Keywords

literary text, paradox, meaning, communicative function, interpretation

PDF

References

  1. Abdurahmonov H. Mahmudov N.So‘z estetikasi. – Toshkent.:Fan,1981.-B.38-37
  2. Xamidova S.B. Paradoksning lingvokultrologik tahlili// Ta`lim,fan va innovatsiya ma’naviy, ma’rifiy, ilmiy-uslubiy jurnal –Toshkent,2023.-№2.-B.250-253
  3. Xamidova.S.B.Ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida paradoksning ma’no hosil qilish potensiali//Xorazm Ma’mun Akademiyasi Axborotnomasi.Xiva -2023-5/4 B.191-193
  4. Xamidova S.B.Paradoks lingvistik fenomen sifatida // Innovation in Technology And Science Education.SJIF 2023:5.305 ISSN 2181-371X Volume 2 Issue 8.B.1044-1053.www.humoscience.com
  5. Xamidova.S.B. Paradoks lingvistik fenomen sifatida //Scientific Aspects and Trends in the Field of Scientific Research. Poland International Scientific Online Conference.- Poland. Warsaw, 2023.March 30.Part 8.P.338-343
  6. Baldick Chris. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms //N.Y.: Оxford university press, 2001. – P . 183.
  7. 43.Batanouny G.M. El. Syntactic and Semantic Classification of Paradox and their Relation to Reader's Interpretation. // Journal of Literary Semantics. –Canterbury, 1991. – XX/3. – p. 129-163.
  8. 44.Bertolet R. What is said: A theory of indirect speech reports /R.Bertolet. – Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer, 1990. – 251 p.
  9. 45.Dilthey W. The Rise of Hermeneutics // New LitHistory.Charlottesville, 1972. – V.2. – №2. – P 229-243.
  10. 46.Dahl R. You never know. – Moscow: “Tsitadel”, 2001. – 206p
  11. 47.Dowden B. The Liar Paradox. Annual Internet encyclopedia Philosophy.2007. available at: www.iep.utm.edu/p/par-liar.htm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.