Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Advancing Enterprise Web Frameworks: A Comprehensive Analysis of ASP.NET Core Evolution and Its Implications for Modern Digital Platforms

Abstract

The evolution of web application frameworks has profoundly influenced the landscape of enterprise software development, enabling enhanced scalability, cross-platform functionality, and integration with emerging digital technologies. Among these frameworks, ASP.NET has undergone significant transformations, culminating in the release of ASP.NET Core, which offers developers advanced tools, improved performance, and flexibility in application deployment across heterogeneous environments (Valiveti, 2025). This research provides a holistic examination of ASP.NET Core’s evolution from traditional ASP.NET, highlighting the methodological approaches employed in its development, the underlying strategies guiding its adoption, and its comparative advantages over alternative platforms such as Flutter and React Native (Gülcüoğlu, Ustun & Seyhan, 2021). The study integrates conceptual frameworks of digital platform evolution, cross-platform integration strategies, and automation in enterprise systems to situate ASP.NET Core within broader organizational and technological contexts (Nitsche, Straube & Wirth, 2021; Schreieck, Ondrus, Wiesche & Krcmar, 2024).

Utilizing a systematic literature synthesis, this research examines the drivers of ASP.NET Core adoption, including performance optimization, modular architecture, and alignment with emerging trends in cloud-based deployment and microservices. Additionally, the study explores the implications of these technological shifts on logistics and service-oriented industries, particularly with respect to cross-platform mobile applications and innovative transport logistics systems (Dires & Supekova, 2023; Serdyukova, Bashirzade & Pakhomova, 2020). Through critical analysis of contemporary digital platform strategies, the research demonstrates how ASP.NET Core’s modularity and extensibility facilitate ecosystem orchestration, inter-organizational network integration, and responsive adaptation to market-driven disruptions (Autio, 2022; Shipilov & Gawer, 2020). The findings reveal that organizations leveraging ASP.NET Core experience enhanced agility, reduced development cycles, and improved capacity to integrate emerging technologies, including data-driven decision-making and intelligent automation (Faget, 2024; Cusumano, Gawer & Yoffie, 2019).

This study contributes to the scholarly discourse by bridging technical, managerial, and strategic perspectives, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding the multifaceted impact of ASP.NET Core on contemporary enterprise systems. The research underscores the necessity for enterprises to adopt adaptive development strategies that reconcile legacy system constraints with the imperatives of digital transformation and platform-based innovation. Furthermore, this study identifies critical gaps in existing literature concerning empirical assessments of performance outcomes, adoption barriers, and integration challenges associated with ASP.NET Core, providing a foundation for future research in software engineering, platform innovation, and digital ecosystem management.

Keywords

ASP.NET Core, web frameworks, cross-platform development, digital platforms

pdf

References

  1. Schreieck, M.; Ondrus, J.; Wiesche, M.; Krcmar, H. A typology of multi-platform integration strategies. Inf. Syst. J. 2024, 34, 828–853.
  2. Gülcüoğlu, Ekrem; Ustun, Ahmet; Seyhan, Neşet. Comparison of Flutter and React Native Platforms. Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 2021.
  3. Delmestri, G.; Greenwood, R. From a Cinderella into a Queen’: Radical status recategorization. Adm. Sci. Q. 2016, 61, 507–550.
  4. Faget, Madalina-Floriana. The impact of Emerging Technologies on Logistics: A Comprehensive Analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2024, 18, 1868-1881.
  5. Cusumano, M.A.; Gawer, A.; Yoffie, D.B. The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power; Harper Business: New York, NY, USA, 2019.
  6. Nitsche, Benjamin; Straube, Frank; Wirth, Maximilian. Application areas and antecedents of automation in logistics and supply chain management: a conceptual framework. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 2021, 22(3).
  7. Dires, Marian; Supekova, Sona Chovanova. The use of mobile applications in logistics of services. Acta Logistica 2023, 10(3).
  8. Autio, E. Orchestrating ecosystems: A multi-layered framework. Innovation, 2022, 24, 96–109.
  9. Habtay, S.R. A firm-level analysis on the relative difference between technology-driven and market-driven disruptive business model innovations. Creat. Innov. Manag. 2012, 21, 290–303.
  10. Grodal, S.; Gotsopoulos, A.; Suarez, F.F. The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2015, 40, 423–445.
  11. Reuber, A.R.; Dimitratos, P.; Kuivalainen, O. Beyond categorization: New directions for theory development about entrepreneurial internationalization. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2017, 48, 411–422.
  12. Serdyukova, Larisa O.; Bashirzade, R.R.K.; Pakhomova, Alla V. Digital platforms for the development of innovative transport logistic systems. π-Economy, 2020, 13(2), 64–78.
  13. Montauti, M.; Wezel, F.C. Charting the territory: Recombination as a source of uncertainty for potential entrants. Organ. Sci. 2016, 27, 954–971.
  14. Shipilov, A.; Gawer, A. Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2020, 14, 92–121.
  15. De Cornière, A.; Taylor, G. Data-driven mergers. Manag. Sci. 2024, 70, 6473–6482.
  16. Konstan, J.A.; Riedl, J. Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 2012, 22, 101–123.
  17. Ciarli, T.; Kenney, M.; Massini, S.; Piscitello, L. Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Res. Policy 2021, 50, 104289.
  18. Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550.
  19. Gioia, D.A.; Corley, K.G.; Hamilton, A.L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 2013, 16, 15–31.
  20. Suarez, F.F.; Grodal, S.; Gotsopoulos, A. Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strateg. Manag. J. 2015, 36, 437–448.
  21. Condorelli, D.; Padilla, J. Data-driven envelopment with privacy-policy tying. Econ. J. 2024, 134, 515–537.
  22. Simplifying Cross-Platform Architecture for Logistics Applications: A Developer’s Guide. https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJCET 966.
  23. Yoo, Y.; Henfridsson, O.; Kallinikos, J.; Gregory, R.; Burtch, G.; Chatterjee, S.; Sarker, S. The next frontiers of digital innovation research. Inf. Syst. Res. 2024, 35, 1507–1523.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.