COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES OF THE LINGUISTIC SUBJECT IN UZBEK LEGAL DISCOURSE
Abstract
This article examines the communicative-pragmatic strategies employed by the linguistic subject in Uzbek legal discourse. The study explores the linguistic tools used to convey directives, obligations, prohibitions, and permissions within legal texts, including court decisions and notarial documents. The analysis demonstrates how these strategies reflect institutional authority, normative constraints, and hierarchical relations among legal actors. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of pragmatic mechanisms in Uzbek legal communication and the role of linguistic form in ensuring legal efficacy and formal clarity.
Keywords
Legal discourse, linguistic subject, communicative strategy, pragmatic tool, speech culture, legal text, social communication, language and interaction, juridical speech.
References
- Austin, J., & Searle, J. (n.d.). Speech Act Theory.
- Karasik, V. I. (n.d.). Linguistic Subject in Discourse Studies.
- Golovanova, E. I., Alekseyeva, L. M., & Issers, O. S. (n.d.). Pragmatic Features of Legal Discourse.
- Nurmonov, A., Yo‘ldoshev, B., Jo‘rayev, M., & Safarov, Sh. (n.d.). Official Style and Legal Linguistics.
- Loshchilin, A. N., & Frantsuzov, N. F. (Eds.). (2002). Philosophy of Creativity [Text]. Moscow: FO.
- Makarov, M. R. (2003). Foundations of Discourse Theory. Moscow: Gnosis.
- Maksimenko, E. S. (2006). Legal Text: Structure and Interpretation. Rostov-on-Don.
- Maltseva, V. A. (2011). Strategies of Speech Influence in Professional Communication: The Example of Legal Discourse [Abstract of PhD Dissertation in Philology]. Chelyabinsk.
- Maslova, V. A. (2004). Linguoculturology: Textbook (2nd ed., revised and supplemented). Moscow: Akademiya.
- Austin, J. (1986). How to Do Things with Words. Moscow: Progress.