Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2026)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

MODERN APPROACHES TO THE ASSESSMENT AND PRESERVATION OF REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL IN WOMEN WITH OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOMAS

Published 2026-04-23

  • Sotvoldiyeva Odina

Sotvoldiyeva Odina
Master's resident of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, Andijan State Medical Institute,

Abstract

Ovarian endometriomas, a common manifestation of Endometriosis, are closely associated with impaired reproductive function and infertility in women of reproductive age. This study aimed to evaluate modern approaches to the assessment and preservation of reproductive potential in women diagnosed with ovarian endometriomas. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 women aged 18–40 years, divided into three groups based on management strategy: conservative treatment, surgical intervention, and assisted reproductive technology, including In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).Reproductive potential was assessed using biochemical markers such as anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and estradiol levels, along with ultrasound parameters including antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume. Clinical outcomes such as pregnancy rates, time to conception, and miscarriage rates were evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period. The results demonstrated that surgical management was associated with a significant decline in ovarian reserve markers, while conservative management preserved ovarian function but resulted in longer time to conception. The IVF group showed the highest clinical pregnancy rates and the shortest time to conception, with stable ovarian reserve parameters. A significant correlation was found between AMH levels and reproductive outcomes. In conclusion, individualized management strategies are essential for optimizing reproductive outcomes in women with ovarian endometriomas. Assisted reproductive technologies appear to be the most effective approach for achieving pregnancy, while conservative management may be preferable for preserving ovarian reserve in selected patients.

Keywords

Ovarian endometrioma; Endometriosis; Reproductive potential; Ovarian reserve; Anti-Müllerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Infertility; Laparoscopic cystectomy; In Vitro Fertilization; Assisted reproductive technology

PDF

References

  1. Giudice, L.C. (2010). Endometriosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(25), 2389–2398.
  2. Vercellini, P., Viganò, P., Somigliana, E., & Fedele, L. (2014). Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 10(5), 261–275.
  3. Somigliana, E., Infantino, M., Benedetti, F., Arnoldi, M., Calanna, G., & Ragni, G. (2012). The presence of ovarian endometriomas is associated with a reduced ovarian reserve. Human Reproduction, 27(2), 310–315.
  4. Uncu, G., Kasapoglu, I., Ozerkan, K., Seyhan, A., Oral, Y., & Ata, B. (2013). Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve. Human Reproduction, 28(8), 2140–2145.
  5. Broer, S.L., Broekmans, F.J.M., Laven, J.S.E., & Fauser, B.C.J.M. (2014). Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications. Human Reproduction Update, 20(5), 688–701.
  6. Guerriero, S., Condous, G., van den Bosch, T., Valentin, L., Leone, F.P.G., Van Schoubroeck, D., et al. (2016). Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48(3), 318–332.
  7. Raine-Fenning, N.J., Campbell, B.K., Kendall, N.R., Clewes, J.S., & Johnson, I.R. (2008). Quantifying the effect of interobserver variability in ovarian reserve assessment. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 31(6), 699–707.
  8. Raffi, F., Metwally, M., & Amer, S. (2012). The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 97(9), 3146–3154.
  9. Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J.A., Domingo, J., Remohí, J., & Pellicer, A. (2020). Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 113(2), 291–302.
  10. Kitajima, M., Defrère, S., Dolmans, M.M., Colette, S., Squifflet, J., Van Langendonckt, A., & Donnez, J. (2011). Endometriomas as a possible cause of reduced ovarian reserve. Fertility and Sterility, 96(3), 685–691.
  11. Harb, H.M., Gallos, I.D., Chu, J., Harb, M., Coomarasamy, A., & Farquhar, C. (2013). The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 120(11), 1308–1320.
  12. Altman, D.G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall.
  13. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). (2022). Endometriosis Guidelin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.