Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO ASSESSING MEDICAL STUDENTS' COMPETENCIES IN SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING: DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF A TESTING SYSTEM

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study examining the effectiveness of an innovative competency assessment system for medical students in simulation-based learning environments. The developed testing system has been integrated into the educational process and enables comprehensive evaluation of both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Analysis of student survey data and test results demonstrates improved objectivity of assessment and enhanced quality of future physicians' training. The proposed approach contributes to the development of clinical thinking and increases student motivation for learning.

Keywords

simulation-based learning, competency-based approach, medical education, testing system, skills assessment, objective structured clinical examination, digitalization of education.

PDF

References

  1. Aggarwal R., Mytton O.T., Derbrew M. et al. Training and simulation for patient safety // Quality and Safety in Health Care. — 2010. — Vol. 19 (Suppl. 2). — P. i34-i43.
  2. Boulet J.R., Murray D.J. Simulation-based assessment in anesthesiology: requirements for practical implementation // Anesthesiology. — 2010. — Vol. 112, № 4. — P. 1041-1052.
  3. Cook D.A., Hamstra S.J., Brydges R. et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis // Medical Teacher. — 2013. — Vol. 35, № 1. — P. e867-e898.
  4. Dent J.A., Harden R.M., Hunt D. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. — 5th ed. — Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2017. — 424 p.
  5. Frank J.R., Snell L., Sherbino J. (eds.) CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. — Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2015. — 30 p.
  6. Harden R.M., Gleeson F.A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) // Medical Education. — 1979. — Vol. 13, № 1. — P. 41-54.
  7. Holmboe E.S., Sherbino J., Long D.M. et al. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education // Medical Teacher. — 2010. — Vol. 32, № 8. — P. 676-682.
  8. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R. et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review // Medical Teacher. — 2005. — Vol. 27, № 1. — P. 10-28.
  9. Kogan J.R., Holmboe E.S., Hauer K.E. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review // JAMA. — 2009. — Vol. 302, № 12. — P. 1316-1326.
  10. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan. State Programme for the Development of Medical Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2022-2030. — Tashkent: Ministry of Health, 2022. — 48 p.
  11. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement // Academic Medicine. — 2001. — Vol. 76, № 4. — P. 390-393.
  12. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Cohen E.R. et al. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence // Academic Medicine. — 2011. — Vol. 86, № 6. — P. 706-711.
  13. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being // American Psychologist. — 2000. — Vol. 55, № 1. — P. 68-78.
  14. Scalese R.J., Obeso V.T., Issenberg S.B. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education // Journal of General Internal Medicine. — 2008. — Vol. 23 (Suppl. 1). — P. 46-49.
  15. Zayapragassarazan Z., Kumar S. Active learning methods // Online Submission. — 2012. — Vol. 19, № 1. — P. 3-5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.