Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

A HYBRID ALGORITHM OF FBP AND GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS (GAN) TO COMPENSATE FOR DATA INSUFFICIENCY IN SPARSE-VIEW TOMOGRAPHY

Abstract

This article proposes a novel hybrid algorithm for image reconstruction in computed tomography (CT) using sparse-view projection data. It is well known that the traditional Filtered Back Projection (FBP) method introduces severe streak artifacts in limited-angle sinograms. On the other hand, fully iterative Total Variation (TV) methods provide high-quality results but are highly computationally time-consuming. Taking this into account, we have developed a method that initially performs rapid base image recovery using FBP and subsequently refines it through a supervised Conditional GAN (cGAN) architecture. This FBP-GAN approach effectively eliminates noise and residual artifacts present in the base image. Conducted visual and quantitative analyses have demonstrated that the proposed method is significantly superior to the conventional U-Net and pure iterative methods. Specifically, the hybrid method preserves tissue-specific textures and fine details with high precision. Concurrently, the trade-off graph between reconstruction time and PSNR (Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio) metrics confirmed that our method drastically saves computational time. The results indicate that the FBP-GAN algorithm holds great promise for reducing radiation doses and improving computational efficiency in medical diagnostics. In the future, it is planned to test this model under various sensor noise conditions encountered in clinical practice.

Keywords

Computed tomography, sparse-view sinogram, image reconstruction, hybrid algorithm, Filtered Back Projection (FBP), conditional GAN (cGAN), streak artifacts, PSNR metric, deep learning.

PDF

References

  1. Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (2001). Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  2. Natterer, F. (2001). The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
  3. Sidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008). Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53(17), 4777-4807.
  4. Beister, M., Kolditz, D., & Kalender, W. A. (2012). Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Physica Medica, 28(2), 94-108.
  5. Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017). Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(9), 4509-4522.
  6. Kang, E., Min, J., & Ye, J. C. (2017). A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction. Medical Physics, 44(10), e360-e375.
  7. Wang, G., Ye, J. C., Mueller, K., & Fessler, J. A. (2018). Image reconstruction is a new frontier of machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37(6), 1289-1296.
  8. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27.
  9. Wolterink, J. M., Leiner, T., Viergever, M. A., & Išgum, I. (2017). Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(12), 2536-2545.
  10. Yang, Q., Yan, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Shi, Y., Mou, X., ... & Wang, G. (2018). Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance and perceptual loss. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37(6), 1348-1357.
  11. Antun, V., Renna, F., Poon, C., Adcock, B., & Hansen, A. C. (2020). On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48), 30088-30095.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.