Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

HOLISTIC DEVSECOPS FOR DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS: UNIFYING ZERO TRUST ARCHITECTURE, BLOCKCHAIN PROVENANCE, AND INTELLIGENCE-DRIVEN SECURITY AUTOMATION

Abstract

Background: Modern software delivery environments—characterized by microservices, cloud-native architectures, distributed ledgers, and cyber-physical integrations—present complex security challenges that traditional perimeter-based defenses cannot adequately address. This paper proposes a cohesive, research-grounded framework that integrates Zero Trust principles, selective blockchain primitives, automated threat intelligence, and adaptive risk-aware controls into Dev SecOps pipelines. Objective: To articulate a theoretically rigorous, practically implementable architecture and methodology for embedding continuous, automated security validation into the software delivery lifecycle while managing scalability, cost, and regulatory constraints.

Methods: We synthesize cross-disciplinary literature (security engineering, blockchain, DevOps adoption studies, cyber-physical systems, and post-quantum planning) to design an integrative model; we then describe procedural instantiations, developer interaction patterns, and governance constructs to operationalize the model.

Results: The conceptual framework yields traceable security attestations, improved anomaly detection surfaces for CPS telemetry, and a policy-driven automation layer that minimizes human slowdowns without sacrificing control.

Conclusions: Combining Zero Trust controls, selective blockchain anchoring for provenance, and automated CTI-driven gating provides a resilient path for Dev SecOps evolution. Realizing the framework requires targeted investments in developer education, tooling alignment, and phased regulatory mapping.

Keywords

Dev SecOps, Zero Trust, blockchain provenance

PDF

References

  1. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media.
  2. Kindervag, J. (2010). “No More Chewy Centers: Introducing the Zero Trust Model of Information Security.” Forrester Research.
  3. Verizon. (Annual publication). Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.
  4. Gartner. (2019). Continuous Delivery and DevOps: A Survey of Adoption.
  5. PCI Security Standards Council. (2018). Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) v3.2.1.
  6. Lange, F. (2017). “Fostering Collaboration in Cross-Functional Teams,” IEEE Engineering Management Review, 45(3), 24–31.
  7. NIST. (2024). “Post-Quantum Cryptography: NIST’s Plan for the Future.” https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography
  8. Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017). “Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 1802–1831.
  9. Staples, M., et al. (2018). “Risks and Opportunities of Blockchain for DevSecOps,” IEEE Software, 35(4), 47–53.
  10. Chavan, A. (2023). “Managing scalability and cost in microservices architecture: Balancing infinite scalability with financial constraints,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2, E264. http://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)E264
  11. Malik, G. (2025). “Integrating Threat Intelligence with DevSecOps: Automating Risk Mitigation before Code Hits Production,” Utilitas Mathematica, 122(2), 309–340.
  12. Corecco, S., Adorni, G., & Gambardella, L. M. (2023). “Proximal policy optimization-based reinforcement learning and hybrid approaches to explore the cross array task optimal solution,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5(4), 1660–1679.
  13. Danilova, A., Naiakshina, A., & Smith, M. (2020, June). “One size does not fit all: a grounded theory and online survey study of developer preferences for security warning types.” In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 136–148).
  14. Freeman, E., & Harvey, N. (2020). 97 Things Every Cloud Engineer Should Know. O'Reilly Media.
  15. Ghura, B. S. (2023). “Scaling & Automating Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Operations with Free and Open-source Software (FOSS).”
  16. He, J., Cheng, Z., & Guo, B. (2022). “Anomaly detection in satellite telemetry data using a sparse feature-based method,” Sensors, 22(17), 6358.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.