MORPHOLOGICALLY STRUCTURED TERMS
Abstract
This article examines the morphological structure of methodological terms in English and Uzbek from a comparative-analytical perspective. The study classifies terms into several categories, including simple, affixal, compound, abbreviated, and calqued forms. The findings demonstrate that affixation and compounding are the most productive word-formation strategies in both languages. However, English shows a stronger tendency toward compounding, whereas Uzbek predominantly relies on affixation. The analysis reveals both universal and language-specific characteristics of terminological formation. In addition, the study offers practical insights into the standardization, translation, and pedagogical application of methodological terminology, which is particularly important in multilingual educational contexts.
Keywords
terminology, morphology, affixation, compounding, abbreviation, calquing, pedagogy, methodology.
References
- Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Kosaka, T. (2024). Terminology and Pedagogy: Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Tokyo: Springer.
- Likh, G. (1974). Semantika. Moscow: Penguin Books.
- Šarčević, S. (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
- Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.