Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 06 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

METHODS OF ORGANIZING HYGIENIC AIR QUALITY CONTROL IN OPERATING ROOMS

Published 2025-06-29

  • Ibragimov Rustam Abdulxamidovich

Ibragimov Rustam Abdulxamidovich
Assistant at the Department of Surgical Diseases and Civil Protection, Andijan State Medical Institute (ASMI), Lecturer of the discipline “Life Safety.”

Abstract

Background: The quality of air in operating rooms (ORs) is a fundamental determinant of surgical outcomes and patient safety. Airborne contaminants contribute significantly to surgical site infections (SSIs), thus necessitating robust hygienic control measures.

Objective: This study aimed to review and evaluate current methodologies for organizing hygienic air quality control in operating rooms, focusing on filtration systems, airflow management, microbial monitoring, and compliance with international standards.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and 2023. Selected articles were analyzed for evidence on the effectiveness of High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters, laminar airflow (LAF), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and microbial monitoring protocols.

Results: HEPA filtration and LAF systems were shown to significantly reduce airborne microbial loads. UVGI systems demonstrated supplementary benefits, particularly in conjunction with other control measures. Regular microbial sampling and strict compliance with guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were associated with improved air quality and reduced SSIs.

Conclusion: A comprehensive approach integrating multiple air quality control methods yields the most effective outcomes in OR hygiene. Institutions must prioritize consistent application of evidence-based interventions and ensure adherence to international standards to safeguard surgical environments.

Keywords

Operating room hygiene; air quality control; HEPA filtration; laminar airflow; ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI); microbial monitoring; surgical site infections; infection prevention; WHO guidelines; CDC compliance.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228–41.
  2. Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Cambronne ED, Lewis BD, Brown KR, Towne JB. Molecular epidemiology of microbial contamination in the operating room environment: Is there a risk for infection? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018;19(3):255–60.
  3. Birgand G, Toupet G, Rukly S, Antoniotti G, Deschamps MN, Lepelletier D. Air contamination for predicting wound contamination in clean surgery: a large multicenter study. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(5):516–21.
  4. Weiser MC, Moucha CS. Operating-room ventilation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(5):e29.
  5. Dharan S, Pittet D. Environmental controls in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect. 2002;51(2):79–84.
  6. Humphreys H. Microbiological monitoring of the environment in hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(4):379–84.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  9. Leaper DJ, Ousey K. Evidence update for reducing risk of surgical site infection. Wounds Int. 2015;6(2):25–32.
  10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
  11. Agodi A, Auxilia F, Barchitta M, Brusaferro S, D'Alessandro D, Montagna MT, et al. Operating theatre ventilation systems and microbial air contamination in total joint replacement surgery: results of the GISIO-ISChIA study. J Hosp Infect. 2015;90(3):213–9.
  12. Chow TT, Yang XY. Ventilation performance in operating theatres against airborne infection: review of research activities and practical guidance. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(3):245–55.
  13. Clark RP, Price MJ. The effectiveness of ventilation systems in the control of airborne particles in operating rooms. J Hyg (Lond). 2016;96(3):439–56.
  14. Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Gastmeier P. Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):553–61.
  15. Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, Daschner F, Gastmeier P, Rüden H. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;252(3):511–6.
  16. Memarzadeh F, Olmsted RN, Bartley JM. Applications of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation disinfection in health care facilities: Effective adjunct, but not stand-alone technology. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(5 Suppl 1):S13–24.
  17. Ritter MA, Olberding EM, Malinzak RA. Efficacy of ultraviolet light in reducing airborne contamination in an operating room orthopaedic surgery setting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(3):e10.
  18. Pasquarella C, Vitali P, Saccani E, Sansebastiano G, Ugolotti M, Boccacci M, et al. Microbial air monitoring in operating theatres: experience at the University Hospital of Parma. J Prev Med Hyg. 2020;61(2):E258–65.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.