Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

UNSUPERVISED FEATURE ACQUISITION IN MULTIMODAL SYSTEMS: INTEGRATING CONTRASTIVE LEARNING WITH INTRINSIC MOTIVATION PROTOCOLS

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of high-dimensional data across diverse domains, from remote sensing to autonomous robotics, has outpaced the capacity for human annotation. Traditional supervised learning paradigms, while effective, remain inextricably bound to the availability of large-scale, labeled datasets—a constraint that is particularly acute in specialized fields such as fraud detection and environmental monitoring. This article presents the "Intrinsically Motivated Contrastive Framework" (IMCF), a novel methodology that synergizes contrastive learning algorithms with intrinsic motivation mechanisms derived from developmental robotics. By treating the feature extraction process as an exploration problem, the IMCF utilizes prediction error and information gain as internal reward signals, guiding the model to prioritize rare and complex data points without external supervision. We evaluate the framework across multiple domains, including large-scale scene recognition and satellite radar imagery for oil spill detection. Our analysis reveals that integrating intrinsic motivation significantly enhances representation learning in imbalanced datasets, outperforming standard contrastive baselines in few-shot transfer tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this approach facilitates "far transfer" of learned features, enabling models trained on general scene databases to adapt rapidly to specific, unrelated tasks. These findings suggest that mimicking biological curiosity mechanisms is a viable pathway toward robust, unsupervised artificial intelligence.

Keywords

Self-Supervised Learning, Contrastive Learning, Intrinsic Motivation, Multimodal AI

pdf

References

  1. Dip Bharatbhai Patel. (2025). Comparing Neural Networks and Traditional Algorithms in Fraud Detection. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(07), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue07-13
  2. Jianxiong Xiao, James Hays, Krista A Ehinger, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In Computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE conference on, pages 3485–3492. IEEE, 2010.
  3. Brian Alan Johnson, Ryutaro Tateishi, and Nguyen Thanh Hoan. A hybrid pansharpening approach and multiscale object-based image analysis for mapping diseased pine and oak trees. International journal of remote sensing, 34(20):6969–6982, 2013.
  4. Miroslav Kubat, Robert C Holte, and Stan Matwin. Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Machine learning, 30(2-3):195–215, 1998.
  5. Oscar Beijbom, Peter J Edmunds, David I Kline, B Greg Mitchell, and David Kriegman. Automated annotation of coral reef survey images. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 1170–1177. IEEE, 2012.
  6. Jerzy W Grzymala-Busse, Linda K Goodwin, Witold J Grzymala-Busse, and Xinqun Zheng. An approach to imbalanced data sets based on changing rule strength. In Rough-Neural Computing, pages 543–553. Springer, 2004.
  7. Baldassarre, G. & Mirolli, M. (2013). Intrinsically motivated learning in natural and artificial systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  8. Baranes, A. & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2013). ‘Active learning of inverse models with intrinsically motivated goal exploration in robots’, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61(1), 49–73.
  9. Barnett, S. & Ceci, S. (2002). ‘When and where do we apply what we learn? a taxonomy for far transfer’, Psychological Bulletin 128, 612–637.
  10. Barros, P., Parisi, G. I., Fu, D., Liu, X. & Wermter, S. (2017). Expectation learning for adaptive crossmodal stimuli association, EUCog Meeting Proceedings, Zurich, Switzerland.
  11. Barto, A. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and reinforcement learning, Baldassarre, G., Mirolli, M. (Eds.), Intrinsically Motivated Learning in Natural and Artificial Systems. Springer.
  12. Bellemare, M., Srinivasan, S., Ostrovski, G., Schaul, T., Saxton, D. & Munos, R. (2016). Unifying count-based exploration and intrinsic motivation.
  13. Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R. & Weston, J. (2009). Curriculum learning, pp. 41–48.
  14. Benna, M. K. & Fusi, S. (2016). ‘Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation’, Nature Neuroscience 19(12), 1697–1708.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.