HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION, REAL-TIME RISK ANALYSIS, AND EVENT-STREAM GOVERNANCE: INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORKS FOR WEARABLE SENSING AND ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Abstract
Background: The proliferation of wearable sensors and advances in machine learning have enabled human activity recognition (HAR) systems to reach levels of granularity and reliability previously unattainable. Simultaneously, the rise of event-stream processing and event sourcing architectures has reshaped how organizations perform real-time risk analysis and governance. Despite parallel progress in these domains, cross-disciplinary frameworks that unify sensor-level HAR, edge-to-cloud event streaming, and enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) practices remain underdeveloped.
Objective: This article synthesizes evidence from sensor-design studies, HAR datasets and algorithms, event-streaming technologies, and governance practice literature to propose an integrative conceptual and methodological framework that supports reliable, privacy-aware, and operationally actionable HAR-driven risk analytics.
Methods: We conduct a theory-driven synthesis grounded in empirical studies of accelerometer placement and datasets (Logacjov et al., 2021; Cleland et al., 2013; Stewart et al., 2018; Bao & Intille, 2004; Olguín & Pentland, 2006), algorithmic comparisons of ensemble learning and deep models (Abid et al., 2021; Hoang & Pietrosanto, 2022), engineering design for wearable systems (Nachiar et al., 2020), and event-stream processing and governance resources including Kafka event-sourcing (Kesarpu & Dasari, 2025), RisingWave surveys (RisingWave, 2024), and GRC guidance (LeanIX; Pathlock, 2025). From these sources we derive architectural patterns, data-flow principles, and evaluation criteria.
Results: We articulate a layered architecture that couples multi-sensor HAR pipelines with robust event-sourcing and policy-aware GRC modules. The architecture emphasizes (a) sensor placement and calibration best practices to maximize signal fidelity, (b) hybrid modeling strategies—ensemble and deep learning—to balance accuracy and interpretability, (c) stream-first engineering using Kafka-style event sourcing and modern event processors for low-latency analytics, and (d) governance mechanisms for schema management, privacy, and auditability. We describe evaluation protocols for operational deployment including latency–accuracy trade-off analyses, model drift detection, and risk-score validation.
Conclusions: Integrating HAR systems with event-stream processing and formalized governance produces practical benefits for real-time risk detection and decision support in health monitoring, occupational safety, and context-aware services. However, careful attention to sensor economics, model generalizability, privacy regulation, and organizational adoption pathways is essential. We conclude with a research agenda that prioritizes longitudinal field evaluation, explainable hybrid-model development, and prescriptive governance tooling.
Keywords
Human Activity Recognition, Wearable Sensors, Event Sourcing
References
- Logacjov, A.; Bach, K.; Kongsvold, A.; Bårdstu, H. B.; Mork, P. J. HARTH: A Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Machine Learning. Sensors 2021, 21, 7853.
- Stewart, T.; Narayanan, A.; Hedayatrad, L.; Neville, J.; Mackay, L.; Duncan, S. A Dual-Accelerometer System for Classifying Physical Activity in Children and Adults. Med. Sci. Sport Exerc. 2018, 50, 2595–2602.
- Cleland, I.; Kikhia, B.; Nugent, C.; Boytsov, A.; Hallberg, J.; Synnes, K.; McClean, S.; Finlay, D. Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities. Sensors 2013, 13, 9183–9200.
- Bao, L.; Intille, S. S. Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data. In Pervasive Computing; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Ferscha, A., Mattern, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 1–17.
- Olguín, D. O.; Pentland, A. Human activity recognition: Accuracy across common locations for wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Montreaux, Switzerland, 11–14 October 2006; pp. 11–13.
- Nachiar, C. C.; Ambika, N.; Moulika, R.; Poovendran, R. Design of Cost-Effective Wearable Sensors with Integrated Health Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India, 7–9 October 2020.
- Abid, M.; Khabou, A.; Ouakrim, Y.; Watel, H.; Chemcki, S.; Mitiche, A.; Benazza-Benyahia, A.; Mezghani, N. Physical Activity Recognition Based on a Parallel Approach for an Ensemble of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers. Sensors 2021, 21, 4713.
- Hoang, M. L.; Pietrosanto, A. New Artificial Intelligence Approach to Inclination Measurement Based on MEMS Accelerometer. IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. 2022, 3, 67–77.
- RisingWave, "Top Event Stream Processing Software: Unveiling the Best Tools," 2024. Available: https://risingwave.com/blog/top-event-stream-processing-software-unveiling-the-best-tools/
- LeanIX, "Technology Risk Management," LeanIX Infographic. Available: https://www.leanix.net/en/wiki/trm/technology-risk-management
- Kesarpu, S.; Dasari, H. P. Kafka Event Sourcing for Real-Time Risk Analysis. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 2025, 11(3).
- Chakraborty, P. Structured Data and Schema Markup for Financial Websites. WinSavvy. 2025. Available: https://www.winsavvy.com/structured-data-and-schema-for-financial-websites/
- Pathlock (Keri Bowman), Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC): A Complete Guide. Pathlock, 2025. Available: https://pathlock.com/learn/governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-a-complete-guide/