Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Accelerating Secure, Resilient, and Intelligent Product Development: Integrating AI, Edge Computing, and DevSecOps for Reduced Time-to-Market and Enhanced Reliability

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive, theoretically rich synthesis and original argument regarding the integration of data analytics, predictive fault management, and rigorous verification and validation practices to achieve resilient, scalable cyber-physical systems and enterprise applications. Motivated by contemporary challenges in manufacturing defect management, exascale system reliability, microservices economics, SoC verification, and enterprise data governance, the manuscript constructs a unified conceptual framework that links analytics-driven simulation, predictive reliability, fault-tolerant architecture, and formal and empirical verification methods (Aqlan et al., 2017; Canal et al., 2020; Chavan, 2023; Chen et al., 2017). The methodology is descriptive and theoretical, synthesizing extant empirical evidence and methodological advances from the literature into a set of design principles and procedural recommendations for practitioners and researchers. Results are presented as an integrative account: analytics-informed simulation improves defect detection and prioritization in manufacturing and service pipelines (Aqlan et al., 2017); predictive reliability architectures and proactive fault management reduce outage frequency in large-scale systems (Canal et al., 2020); event-driven and microservice designs must trade off consistency semantics against cost and scalability constraints (Chavan, 2021; Chavan, 2023); and advances in formal verification, pre-silicon DFT, and AI-assisted testing substantively raise assurance in semiconductor and autonomous systems (Cadence, 2023; Lulla, 2025; Amelia, 2024). The discussion interrogates limitations of current approaches—data governance fragmentation, model uncertainty, verification-resource tradeoffs—and proposes a layered, governance-aware integration strategy that emphasizes traceability, hybrid verification (formal plus empirical), and predictive fault orchestration. Concluding remarks outline a research agenda spanning adaptive simulation-driven testing, cross-domain fault taxonomy, cost-aware consistency selection, and governance-frameworks for ERP/MDM ecosystems. The article aims to serve as a bridge between theory and practice, offering detailed conceptual tools and actionable directions for designing resilient, verifiable, and economically sustainable systems across industries. (Keywords: data analytics integration, predictive reliability, verification and validation, fault-tolerant systems, data governance)

Keywords

data analytics integration, predictive reliability, verification and validation, fault-tolerant systems

pdf

References

  1. Aqlan, F., Ramakrishnan, S., & Shamsan, A. (2017, December). Integrating data analytics and simulation for defect management in manufacturing environments. In 2017 winter simulation conference (WSC) (pp. 3940-3951). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2017.8248104
  2. Bonthu, C. (2025). The role of data governance in strengthening ERP and MDM collaboration. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering. https://ijcesen.com/index.php/ijcesen/article/view/3783
  3. Bonthu, C. (2025). Unifying multiple ERP systems: A case study on data migration and integration. Utilitas Mathematica. https://utilitasmathematica.com/index.php/Index/article/view/2785
  4. Canal, R., Hernandez, C., Tornero, R., Cilardo, A., Massari, G., Reghenzani, F., ... & Abella, J. (2020). Predictive reliability and fault management in exascale systems: State of the art and perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(5), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3403956
  5. Chavan, A. (2023). Managing scalability and cost in microservices architecture: Balancing infinite scalability with financial constraints. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2, E264. http://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)E264
  6. Chavan, A. (2024). Fault-tolerant event-driven systems: Techniques and best practices. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology, 6, E167. http://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2024(6)E167
  7. Chavan, A. (2021). Eventual consistency vs. strong consistency: Making the right choice in microservices. International Journal of Software and Applications, 14(3), 45-56. https://ijsra.net/content/eventual-consistency-vs-strong-consistency-making-right-choicemicroservices
  8. Chen, W., Ray, S., Bhadra, J., Abadir, M., & Wang, L. C. (2017). Challenges and trends in modern SoC design verification. IEEE Design & Test, 34(5), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2017.2735383
  9. Dhanagari, M. R. (2024). MongoDB and data consistency: Bridging the gap between performance and reliability. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.21
  10. Dhanagari, M. R. (2025). Bridging IoT and Healthcare: Secure, Real-Time Data Exchange with Aerospike and Salesforce Marketing Cloud. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(4). https://ijcesen.com/index.php/ijcesen/article/view/3853/1161
  11. Almasi, M. M., Hemmati, H., Fraser, G., Arcuri, A., & Benefelds, J. (2017, May). An industrial evaluation of unit test generation: Finding real faults in a financial application. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP) (pp. 263-272). IEEE.
  12. Lulla, K. (2025). Pre-Silicon DFT Feedback Loops: Enhancing GPU Productisation Efficiency. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3778
  13. Amelia, O. (2024). AI-Driven Testing and Validation Techniques for Low-Power Semiconductor Design Verification Using UVM.
  14. Araujo, H., Mousavi, M. R., & Varshosaz, M. (2023). Testing, validation, and verification of robotic and autonomous systems: a systematic review. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(2), 1-61.
  15. Arunkumar, K., Sushma, S., & Teja, V. S. (2024, October). Implementing and Verifying the SPI Communication Protocol in ASICs with Cadence EDA Tools. In 2024 Global Conference on Communications and Information Technologies (GCCIT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  16. Bagherzadeh, M., Kahani, N., & Briand, L. (2021). Reinforcement learning for test case prioritization. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(8), 2836-2856.
  17. Balfe, N., Sharples, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2018). Understanding is key: An analysis of factors about trust in a real-world automation system. Human factors, 60(4), 477-495.
  18. Baqar, M., & Khanda, R. (2024). The Future of Software Testing: AI-Powered Test Case Generation and Validation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05808.
  19. Cadence. (2023). JasperGold Formal Verification Platform. https://www.cadence.com
  20. Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019). Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical reviews, 119(19), 10856-10915.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.