Abductive Reasoning, Causality, and Transparency in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Theoretical and Applied Analysis
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a central paradigm in contemporary AI research, driven by the growing societal, ethical, legal, and epistemic demands placed upon algorithmic systems. As AI increasingly mediates high-stakes decisions in domains such as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and public governance, the opacity of complex machine learning models challenges traditional notions of understanding, trust, responsibility, and fairness. This research article develops a comprehensive theoretical and applied analysis of Explainable Artificial Intelligence by integrating philosophical foundations of explanation, abductive inference, causal reasoning, and communicative pragmatics with modern computational approaches to transparency, robustness, and fairness. Drawing strictly from established literature, the article argues that explanation in AI cannot be reduced to post-hoc visualization or feature attribution alone, but must be understood as a multi-layered socio-technical process grounded in human explanatory practices, causal models, and contextual goals. The paper synthesizes insights from cognitive science, philosophy of science, human–computer interaction, and machine learning to articulate an integrative framework for explainability that balances epistemic rigor, usability, ethical accountability, and system performance. Through extensive theoretical elaboration and descriptive analysis of existing methodologies, the article examines how abductive inference underpins both human and machine explanations, how causality and counterfactual reasoning enhance interpretability, and how transparency relates to trust calibration, fairness, robustness, and legal compliance. The discussion critically evaluates current limitations of explainable systems, including risks of false interpretability, misaligned explanations, and regulatory oversimplification. The article concludes by outlining future research directions toward causally grounded, context-aware, and socially situated explainable AI systems capable of supporting responsible and trustworthy deployment across domains.
Keywords
Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Abductive Inference, Causal Interpretability, Transparency
References
- Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D., Madai, V. I. (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20, 310.
- Anjomshoae, S., Omeiza, D., Jiang, L. (2021). Context-based image explanations for deep neural networks. Image and Vision Computing, 116, 104310.
- Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., Mooney, C. (2021). Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11, 5088.
- Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
- Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., Shulner-Tal, A. (2021). Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–26.
- Calders, T., Ntoutsi, E., Pechenizkiy, M., Rosenhahn, B., Ruggieri, S. (2021). Introduction to the special section on bias and fairness in AI. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 23, 1–3.
- Chou, Y.-L., Moreira, C., Bruza, P., Ouyang, C., Jorge, J. (2021). Counterfactuals and causability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Theory, algorithms, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04244.
- Cui, X., Lee, J. M., Hsieh, J. P.-A. (2019). An integrative 3C evaluation framework for explainable artificial intelligence. Proceedings of AMCIS, 1–10.
- Durán, J. M. (2021). Dissecting scientific explanation in AI (sXAI): A case for medicine and healthcare. Artificial Intelligence, 297, 103498.
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, 3, 41–58.
- Holland, M. (2021). Robustness and scalability under heavy tails, without strong convexity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 865–873.
- Josephson, J. R., Josephson, S. G. (1996). Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge University Press.
- Khalilpourazari, S., Khalilpourazary, S., Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu, A., Weber, G.-W. (2021). Designing energy-efficient high-precision multi-pass turning processes via robust optimization and artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 1621–1647.
- Larsson, S., Heintz, F. (2020). Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9, 1–16.
- Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 464–470.
- Lyu, L., Yu, J., Nandakumar, K., Li, Y., Ma, X., Jin, J., Yu, H., Ng, K. S. (2020). Towards fair and privacy-preserving federated deep models. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 31, 2524–2541.
- Malle, B. F. (2006). How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. MIT Press.
- Moraffah, R., Karami, M., Guo, R., Raglin, A., Liu, H. (2020). Causal interpretability for machine learning: Problems, methods and evaluation. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Naser, M. (2021). An engineer’s guide to explainable artificial intelligence and interpretable machine learning. Automation in Construction, 129, 103821.
- Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Broniatowski, D. A., Przybocki, M. A. (2020). Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- Shukla, O. (2025). Explainable Artificial Intelligence modelling for Bitcoin price forecasting. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovation Management, 1, 50–60.
- Subbaswamy, A., Adams, R., Saria, S. (2021). Evaluating model robustness and stability to dataset shift. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2611–2619.
- Thelisson, E. (2017). Towards trust, transparency and liability in AI/AS systems. Proceedings of IJCAI, 5215–5216.
- Vale, D., El-Sharif, A., Ali, M. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence post-hoc explainability methods: Risks and limitations in non-discrimination law. AI and Ethics, 2, 815–826.
- Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., Bellamy, R. K. E. (2020). Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 295–305.