Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 12 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

THE INTEGRATION OF DIGITAL AND COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES IN MODERN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Published 2025-12-21

  • Khudaibergenova Nasiba Marimboevna

Khudaibergenova Nasiba Marimboevna
Urgen Technological University, Department of Russian Language, teacher

Abstract

 The modernization of Russian language teaching methodology has become a critical issue in contemporary linguodidactics due to rapid digitalization and changing educational paradigms. This article explores the integration of communicative and digital approaches in modern Russian language instruction. The study highlights the shift from teacher-centered and grammar-oriented models toward learner-centered, task-based, and technology-enhanced methodologies. Special attention is paid to the role of digital tools in developing communicative competence, learner autonomy, and intercultural awareness. The analysis demonstrates that the effective combination of communicative practices and digital technologies significantly enhances language acquisition outcomes and aligns Russian language education with global educational standards.

Keywords

modern Russian language teaching, communicative approach, digital pedagogy, task-based learning, blended learning, learner autonomy, intercultural competence, formative assessment, educational technologies, foreign language methodology

PDF

References

  1. Bax S. The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT J. 2003;57(3):278–287.
  2. Benson P. Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2011.
  3. Brown HD. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 4th ed. New York: Pearson Education; 2015.
  4. Celce-Murcia M. Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In: Soler EA, Jordà MP, editors. Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 41–57.
  5. Chapelle CA. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  6. Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  7. Dörnyei Z. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  8. Ellis R. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
  9. Hampel R, Stickler U. The use of technology in language teaching. In: Hinkel E, editor. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 645–660.
  10. Hymes D. On communicative competence. In: Pride JB, Holmes J, editors. Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972. p. 269–293.
  11. Kramsch C. Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  12. Larsen-Freeman D, Anderson M. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  13. Little D. Learner autonomy and second language acquisition. Lang Teach. 2007;40(1):1–18.
  14. Long MH. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie WC, Bhatia TK, editors. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 413–468.
  15. Nation ISP, Macalister J. Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  16. Richards JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
  17. Skehan P. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  18. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.