Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

AGREEMENT OF THE SUBJECT WITH THE PREDICATE

Abstract

This article examines distinguishing parts of the sentence into main and secondary we based on their typical “features”.  The reason for calling the subject and the sentence and distinguishing them from all other parts which are treated secondary is that the subject and the predicate between them constitute the backbone of the sentence without them the sentence would not exist at all, whereas all other parts may or may not be there, and if they are there, they serve to or modify either the subject or the predicate, or each other.

Keywords

Language, subject, predicate, verb-predicate, grammatical agreement, structure, clause.

DOWNLOAD PDF CERTIFICATE

References

  1. Alefirenko, N.F. Theory of language / N.F. Alefirenko. - M.: Academy, 2010. 384 p.
  2. Antrushina G.B., Afanasyeva O.V., Morozova N.N. English lexicology. -М.: «Высшая Школа». - 2014.
  3. Ilysh B. “The structure of Modern English”. Lelingrad, 1971
  4. Ivanova, I.P. Theoretical grammar of the English language / I.P. Ivanova, V.V. Byplakova, G.G. Pocheptsov. - M.: Higher school, 1981. - 285c.
  5. Kytyzov, L.F. Practical grammar of the English language / L.F. Kutyzov. – M.: Veche, 1998. – 448c.
  6. Kayshanskaya, V.L. Grammar of the English language / V.L. Kayshanskaya. - L.: Enlightenment, 1973. - 319 p.
  7. Isroilovna, A. M. The Initial Stage of Developing Translation Competence.
  8. Nasrullayeva, T., & Rozikova, F. (2023, May). Modern methods and approaches to teaching simultaneous translation for translation students. In International Conference On Higher Education Teaching (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 59-62).
  9. Tozagul, N. (2023, May). AKT DAN FOYDALANGAN HOLDA MORFOLOGIK KATEGORIYALARNI TARJIMA QILISH. In Конференция: Союз Hауки и Oбразования (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 6-13).
  10. Vinogradov, V.V. Russian language. – M.: Higher school. - 1986. - 640 p

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.