Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE IN ONLINE MESSAGES AND SOCIAL NETWORKS: IDENTIFICATION OF SUSPECTS BASED ON WRITING STYLE, VOCABULARY, GRAMMAR, AND ORTHOGRAPHY

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of online communication has transformed the way individuals interact, leaving digital footprints that can be analyzed for various purposes, including criminal investigations. This article explores how language analysis in online messages and social networks serves as a tool for identifying suspects based on writing style, vocabulary, grammar, and orthography. Through examining existing literature and case studies, the article outlines the methodologies used for linguistic analysis, the significance of linguistic markers, and the ethical considerations surrounding this practice. By understanding the complexities of language in digital communication, law enforcement agencies can enhance their investigative strategies.

Keywords

language analysis, online communication, writing style, suspect identification, social networks.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. Routledge.
  2. Eades, D. (2018). Language and Law: A Practical Handbook. Routledge.
  3. Koppel, M., Argamon, S., & Shimoni, A. (2002). Computational methods in authorship attribution*. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4), 421-433.
  4. Languange and Law. (n.d.). Ethical Guidelines in Forensic Linguistics. Retrieved from
  5. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Olsson, J., & Fuchs, M. (2020). The Language of Distress: Assessing Psychological States Through Textual Analysis*. Journal of Forensic Linguistics, 12(3), 45-66.
  7. Pew Research Center. (2021). Social Media Use in 2021. Retrieved from
  8. Rudman, H. (2021). Stylometry and Authorship Attribution: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Tredennick, A., & Bruner, J. (2018). Analysis of Lexical Choices in Online Communication: Implications for Digital Forensics. Journal of Language and Law, 33(1), 97-116.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.