Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 02 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

TEACHING WRITING CURRENCY VOCABULARY IN ENGLISH: EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES AND PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES

Published 2025-02-13

  • Abdiganiyeva Go’zalxon Oxunjon kizi

Abdiganiyeva Go’zalxon Oxunjon kizi
ISFT, English teacher.

Abstract

 The teaching of writing currency-related vocabulary is essential in English language instruction, especially for students preparing for real-world financial interactions. This paper explores effective methodologies for teaching writing currency vocabulary, including contextual learning, task-based approaches, and digital tools. By integrating authentic materials and interactive activities, educators can enhance student engagement and retention of financial terminology.

Keywords

Currency vocabulary, English language instruction, financial literacy, contextual learning, task-based learning, digital tools, authentic materials, monetary terms, exchange rates, financial terminology, language acquisition.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Abrosimova, L. M. 2000. Kurs Angliyskogo Yazyka dlia Aspirantov [Course of English for Graduate Students]. Sevastopol': Sevastopol' University Press.
  2. Akmaldinova, A. N., and O. A. Pis'mennaya. 1994. Angliyskiy Yazyk v NauchnoProfessional'noy Deyatel'nosti Spetsialista [English for Scientific and Professional Purposes], Kiev: Kiev Civic Aviation University Press.
  3. Berkenkotter, C., and T. Huckin. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  4. Bjork, L., and C. Raisanen. 1997. Academic Writing: A University Writing Course. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  5. Bloch, J., and L. Chi. 1995. A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse. In Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy, D. Belcher and G. Braine (Eds.), 231-274. Northwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  6. Burbak, O. F. (Ed.). 1998. English for Science Students. Chernivtsi: Ruta. Connor, U. 2000. Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text, 20 (1): 1-28.
  7. Connor, U., and A. Mauranen. 1999. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1): 47-62.
  8. Dudley-Evans, T. 1997. Genre models for the teaching of academic writing to second language speakers: Advantages and disadvantages. In Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications, T. Miller (Ed.), 150-159. Washington: USIA.
  9. Gains, J. 1999. Electronic mail-a new style of communication or just a new medium An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1): 81-101.
  10. Hopkins, A.,andT. Dudley-Evans. 1988. A genre-based investigation of discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 1 (2): 113-122.
  11. https://iq.vntu.edu.ua/fm/fdb/1080/Yakhontova_textbook.pdf
  12. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/600976-teacher-guide-for-writing-c1-advanced.pdf
  13. https://www.readandspell.com/how-to-improve-writing-skills-in-English

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.