A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARALINGUISTIC MEANS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES: A LINGUOCULTURAL PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Bozorova O’g’iloy Qurbonali qizi Magistratura talabasi O’zbekiston Davlat Jahon Tillari universiteti

Keywords:

Paralinguistics; non-verbal communication; cross-cultural comparison; phonation; kinesics; graphic elements; Uzbek and English language

Abstract

Paralinguistics is considered interdisciplinary field of modern linguistics, referring  to the non-verbal cues including tone, pitch, body language, and facial expressions that are utilized consciously and unconsciously while communicating . These non verbal aspects of communication serve transmitting and modifying meaning, conveying attitude and emotions, showing cultural intend of communication. This study focuses on comparative analysis of paralinguistics tools in both Uzbek and English languages according to three types of paralinguistic means :phonotion, kinetic and graphic elements. Drawing on linguistic, cultural and semiotic framework, the article explores universal and cultural specific features of paralinguistic communication.The research is based on descriptive-analytical and contrastive methods, integrating both theoretical and observational approaches. Observations indicated that paralinguistic features operate differently owing to various sociocultural boundaries and linguistic traditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduazizova, Durdona. Filological Science, issues 15–16.

Batliner, Anton. (2024). Paralinguistics. In: Speech Sciences Entries. Speech Prosody Studies Group. Disponível em: https://gepf.falar.org/entries/63

Burkxanova, Mashkhurakhon Muhammadovna, & Akhmedova, Madinakhon Muradkhon qizi. (2022). Modern Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 5. ISSN: 2795-4846. https://mjssh.academicjournal.io/index.php/mjssh

Jobs, Steve. (2005). Stanford Commencement Speech.

Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. (1990). Notes in the history of intercultural communication: The Foreign Service Institute and the mandate for intercultural training. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 262–281.

Nurmonov, A. (2012). Tanlangan asarlar. III zhildlik. I Zhild. Tashkent: Academnashr, p. 22.

Salokhiddinova, S.A. (2025). American Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 3, Issue 2. Published: 28-02-2025. ISSN: 2996-5128 (online). ResearchBib Impact Factor: 9.918.

Simpson, Eliza. Speech & Accent Coach. Bold Voice. www.boldvoice.com

Warren, Michael Robert. Language Lounge. www.languagelounge.net

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

Bozorova O’g’iloy Qurbonali qizi. (2025). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARALINGUISTIC MEANS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES: A LINGUOCULTURAL PERSPECTIVE. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(04). Retrieved from https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd/article/view/2959