Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

LESSON PLANNING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION

Abstract

 This article is about lesson planning. When we talk about lesson planning, it can be about several aspects: planning a single lesson, a week, or even planning an entire period of education. The latter is often the task of a college, a school or an institution on the basis of existing curricula and is often referred to as a work plan or material distribution plan. This article is about lesson planning. When we talk about lesson planning, it can be about several aspects: planning a single lesson, a week, or even planning an entire period of education. The latter is often the task of a college, a school or an institution on the basis of existing curricula and is often referred to as a work plan or material distribution plan. Teachers may wonder “which way they ought to go” before they enter a classroom. This usually means that teachers need to plan what they want to do in their classrooms. Most teachers engage in yearly, term, unit, weekly, and daily lesson planning (Yinger, 1980). Yearly and term planning usually involve listing the objectives for a particular program. A unit plan is a series of related lessons around a specific theme such as “The Family.” Planning daily lessons is the end result of a complex planning process that includes the yearly, term, and unit plans. A daily lesson plan is a written description of how students will move toward attaining specific objectives. It describes the teaching behavior that will result in student learning.

Keywords

curricula, curricula, lesson planning, framework plans, the didactic analysis model, teaching goals.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  2. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. University of Michigan Press.
  3. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.
  4. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  5. Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
  6. Fortune, T. W. (2012). What the research says about immersion. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 3–21). Multilingual Matters.
  7. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114
  8. Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  9. Hockly, N. (2018). Technology in English language teaching: Digital literacies. ELT Journal, 72(3), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy014
  10. Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
  11. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  12. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
  13. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. GALA.
  14. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.