Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 05 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES

Published 2025-05-05

  • Jumayev Miraziz Makhmudovich

Jumayev Miraziz Makhmudovich
Bukhara state medical institute

Abstract

Fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) play a critical role in restoring oral function, aesthetics, and patient quality of life. Over the past decade, advancements in dental materials, digital workflows, and minimally invasive techniques have significantly transformed FDP design, fabrication, and clinical performance. This literature review aims to summarize recent developments and highlight the specific features that distinguish fixed prostheses from other treatment modalities. Topics include biomechanical considerations, material selection, longevity, biocompatibility, and patient-centered outcomes. The review also addresses current challenges and future directions in prosthodontics, based on an analysis of scholarly sources published in the last ten years. Findings suggest a shift toward more personalized, durable, and esthetically pleasing solutions supported by evidence-based protocols.

Keywords

Fixed dental prostheses; dental materials; prosthodontics; crown and bridge; digital dentistry; biocompatibility; restoration longevity.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Al-Amleh, B., Lyons, K., & Swain, M. (2010). Clinical trials in zirconia: A systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(8), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02100.x
  2. Chaar, M. S., Att, W., & Strub, J. R. (2011). Prosthetic outcome of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses with more than five years follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(4), 379–386.
  3. Cionca, N., Müller, N., & Mombelli, A. (2017). Two-piece zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns: A prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(4), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12828
  4. Della Bona, A., Pecho, O. E., & Alessandretti, R. (2015). Zirconia as a dental biomaterial. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 47, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.052
  5. Gao, W., Wei, Y., Li, L., Peng, W., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Marginal and internal fit of digital versus conventional impressions for fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 23(1), 648. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03628-1
  6. Katsoulis, J., Kiliaridis, S., & Hug, S. (2021). Technical and biological complications of fixed dental prostheses on teeth and implants. Periodontology 2000, 86(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12351
  7. Pjetursson, B. E., Tan, K., Lang, N. P., Brägger, U., Egger, M., & Zwahlen, M. (2004). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15(6), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x
  8. Pjetursson, B. E., Valente, N. A., Strasding, M., Zwahlen, M., Liu, S., & Sailer, I. (2018). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(S16), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13277
  9. Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Thoma, D. S., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2015). All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dental Materials, 31(6), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
  10. Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Thoma, D. S., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2015). All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dental Materials, 31(6), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013
  11. Zhang, Y., & Lawn, B. R. (2018). Rocking-resistant zirconia prostheses for posterior teeth: Design and clinical perspectives. Dental Materials, 34(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.013
  12. Zitzmann NU, Hagmann E, Weiger R. What is the prevalence of various types of prosthetic dental restorations in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:20-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01435.x. Erratum in: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):326-8. PMID: 17594367.
  13. Grand View Research. (2024). Digital dentistry market size, share & trends analysis report by product (equipment & software), by application (restorative dentistry, orthodontics, implantology), by end-use (dental clinics & hospitals), by region, and segment forecasts, 2025–2030 (Report ID: GVR-4-68040-193-2). Grand View Research. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/digital-dentistry-market-report
  14. Khurshid Z. Digital Dentistry: Transformation of Oral Health and Dental Education with Technology. Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):943-944. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772674. Epub 2023 Sep 20. PMID: 37729928; PMCID: PMC10756720.
  15. Chen J, Cai H, Suo L, Xue Y, Wang J, Wan Q. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017 Apr;59:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 24. PMID: 28212978.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.