Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 05 (2025)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

ORGANIZING PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Published 2025-05-09

  • Holikova Laylo Fakhriddinovna

Holikova Laylo Fakhriddinovna
Associate Professor at Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Pedagogical Sciences

Abstract

The organization of pedagogical experimental research plays a crucial role in the continuous improvement of educational practices. Such research is designed to assess the effectiveness of teaching methods, identify innovative strategies, and enhance the overall quality of the educational process. The goal of pedagogical experimental research is to establish a scientific basis for educational decisions and practices. By conducting experiments, educators can gather empirical data that supports or challenges traditional teaching methods, contributing to the development of more effective teaching strategies. This article explores the main goals and objectives of organizing pedagogical experimental research, its methodological foundations, and its significance in shaping educational policies and practices. The findings emphasize the importance of a systematic approach in implementing pedagogical experiments to foster positive educational outcomes.

Keywords

Pedagogical experimental research, educational strategies, teaching methods, empirical data, educational practice, innovation, experimental methodology, pedagogical development, educational quality.

PDF

References

  1. Anderson, C., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for transform-ing teaching and learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 111(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2012.01149.x
  2. Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  3. Duncan, A. (2011). Innovations in Education and Teaching International: The Role of Experimentation in Teaching. International Journal of Education, 62(2), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.573947
  4. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., & Okoroafor, N. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  5. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  6. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389809602694
  7. Kember, D. (2009). Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire curriculum. Higher Education, 58(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9182-1
  8. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
  9. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.