LEGAL DISCOURSE — A TYPE OF SPECIALIZED DISCOURSE
Abstract
This article examines types of discourse—both general and specialized—along with key features and forms of specialized discourse. It discusses political and legal discourse, the notions of personhood and impersonality in legal discourse, and anthropocentric concepts and their realization in the modern linguistic paradigm.
Keywords
Paradigm, discourse, specialized discourse, theory, normative legal documents, cultural-ideological environment, stylistic, semantic, and pragmatic features.
References
- www.lex.uz — Database of legal documents of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
- Fairclough, N. Language and Power. Longman Group, 1989.
- Foucault, M. Intellectuals and Power: Articles and Interviews, 1970–1984, vol. 3. Praxis, Moscow, 2006.
- Finkel, N. Commonsense Justice: Juror’s Notions of the Law. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Sage, 2009.
- van Deyk, T.A. “On the Definition of Discourse.” (1998).
- Odilova, G.K. “Theory and Practice of Specialized Discourse in Linguocultural Interpretation.” Doctoral dissertation abstract, Tashkent, 2020.
- Safarov, Sh. Pragmalinguistics. Tashkent, 2008, p. 252.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.