Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

INTEGRATING LATIN TERMINOLOGY INTO MODERN PHARMACY CURRICULA: STRATEGIES FOR CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Abstract

This article examines the critical role of Latin terminology within modern pharmaceutical education and proposes strategies for its effective integration into contemporary curricula. Traditionally viewed as a "dead language" focused on rote memorization, Latin remains the foundational pillar of global medical and pharmaceutical communication. The primary objective of this study is to bridge the gap between theoretical linguistic instruction and practical clinical application. By analyzing current pedagogical shortcomings, the research advocates for a "Clinical-Oriented Latin" model that synchronizes terminology with pharmacology, drug technology, and pharmacognosy. The abstract highlights the necessity of moving beyond simple grammar to an etymological analysis of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) and complex prescription writing. Furthermore, the study explores the implementation of digital tools, such as interactive databases and case-study methodologies, to enhance student engagement and retention. Results indicate that integrating Latin within a clinical context significantly reduces medication errors, improves professional communication, and aligns student competencies with international pharmacopoeia standards.

Keywords

Latin terminology, pharmacy education, clinical relevance, drug nomenclature, prescription writing, pedagogical innovation, pharmacopoeia, terminological competence, pharmaceutical forms, etymology, academic integration.

PDF

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). (2024). Guidance on the use of international nonproprietary names (INNs) for pharmaceutical substances. https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-policy-and-standards/inn;
  2. Kondratiev, D. K. (2020). Methodology of teaching Latin to pharmacy students in the digital age. Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.5530/jper.2020.14.3;
  3. Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2022). Integrating Medical Terminology into Clinical Practice: A Pedagogy for Pharmacy Schools. Pharmaceutical Education Journal. https://www.pharmacyeducation.org/articles/vol22/1;
  4. European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition. (2023). General chapters and monographs on pharmaceutical terminology. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-11th-edition;
  5. Shulga, N. V. (2021). Interdisciplinary connections in the study of pharmaceutical Latin. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Education. https://www.ijmse.com/archive/v8/i2;
  6. Uzbekistan Republic Agency for Pharmaceutical Development. (2025). State Pharmacopoeia Standards and Latin Nomenclature Rules. https://uzpharmagency.uz/en/pages/farmakopeya;
  7. Brown, A., & Miller, K. (2022). The Evolution of Latin as a Technical Language in Modern Pharmacology. Journal of Health Communication and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealthling.2022.05.004.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.