Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 11 No. 11 (2024)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

ORGANIZATION OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION FOR MATHEMATICS STUDENTS

Published 2024-11-13

  • Jurayeva Muhayyo Nematillayevna

Jurayeva Muhayyo Nematillayevna
Karshi State University, Senior Lecturer, Department of Algebra and Geometry

Abstract

The organization of independent education for students of mathematics is a crucial factor in developing their analytical, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. Independent education is characterized by self-guided learning, personalized approaches, and the effective use of resources to foster deep understanding. This paper explores methodologies for promoting self-directed learning among mathematics students, including integrating digital tools, active learning strategies, and cooperative learning frameworks. The study examines the pedagogical theories behind independent education, its benefits, and the challenges faced by educators in implementing these strategies effectively. Emphasis is placed on how fostering independent education in mathematics can lead to better learning outcomes, enhanced student motivation, and long-term retention of mathematical concepts.

Keywords

Independent education, Mathematics, Self-directed learning, Active learning, Digital tools, Student motivation.

DOWNLOAD PDF CERTIFICATE

References

  1. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). The impact of independent learning on student engagement. Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 245-260.
  2. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Self-Directed Learning: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2018). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 451-467.
  4. Knowles, M. (2020). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago: Follett.
  5. Piaget, J. (2018). The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. New York: Viking Press.
  6. Zimmerman, B. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
  7. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2019). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Educational Research Review, 15, 19-28.
  9. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 8(1), 25-39.
  10. Buckingham, D. (2021). The rise of digital media in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(3), 239-251.
  11. Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2017). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Education + Training, 57(3), 344-361.
  12. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2018). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 427-441.
  13. Vygotsky, L. S. (2019). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  14. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2019). The flipped classroom: How video is changing the traditional classroom. New Media Consortium, 19(2), 15-29.
  15. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2018). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 12(2), 1-18.
  16. Thomas, J. W. (2019). A review of research on project-based learning. Buck Institute for Education, 1(1), 1-40.
  17. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2018). The role of dynamic technologies in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), 231-246.
  19. Pintrich, P. R. (2021). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 385-407.
  20. Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2020). The effect of flipped classrooms on student achievement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 7(3), 56-67.
  21. Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2017). Project-based learning. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 317-334.
  22. Lajoie, S. P. (2022). Using technology to enhance mathematics learning. Computers & Education, 75, 182-195.
  23. Wenglinsky, H. (2019). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Educational Testing Service.
  24. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2018). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
  25. Siemens, G. (2019). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.